<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian National is &#8220;ApHC-approved&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appaloosablogspot.com/2010/01/28/canadian-national-is-aphc-approved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appaloosablogspot.com/2010/01/28/canadian-national-is-aphc-approved/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://appaloosablogspot.com/2010/01/28/canadian-national-is-aphc-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-70720</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appaloosablogspot.com/?p=2881#comment-70720</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  There may be few but two of the classes we compete in do not have the same rules. The CNAS program indicates they are ApHC approved but are run concurrently.  I appreciate you checking. I asssume if they are on the ApHC approval they would have to be offered &amp; not included would not be an option at this point. I appreciate you checking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  There may be few but two of the classes we compete in do not have the same rules. The CNAS program indicates they are ApHC approved but are run concurrently.  I appreciate you checking. I asssume if they are on the ApHC approval they would have to be offered &amp; not included would not be an option at this point. I appreciate you checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://appaloosablogspot.com/2010/01/28/canadian-national-is-aphc-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-70709</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appaloosablogspot.com/?p=2881#comment-70709</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, there are very few classes that can&#039;t be run concurrently. In those that can&#039;t, they&#039;ll either be separate or not included. I&#039;ll have to get an update and pass that along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, there are very few classes that can&#8217;t be run concurrently. In those that can&#8217;t, they&#8217;ll either be separate or not included. I&#8217;ll have to get an update and pass that along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://appaloosablogspot.com/2010/01/28/canadian-national-is-aphc-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-70708</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appaloosablogspot.com/?p=2881#comment-70708</guid>
		<description>You mention what happens where the rules are consistent. What is the ApHC&#039;s position on where the rules are not consistent? Do the ApHCC &amp; ApHC classes have to be run separately, when approved by both registries? Or is there an exception &amp; if so whose rules apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention what happens where the rules are consistent. What is the ApHC&#8217;s position on where the rules are not consistent? Do the ApHCC &amp; ApHC classes have to be run separately, when approved by both registries? Or is there an exception &amp; if so whose rules apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

